“WE FOUND TOO MANY ABNORMALITIES” FIM President – Ezpeleta made a statement that shook the entire MotoGP when he presented many evidences of suspicious arrangements at GP Mandalika. A secret investigation was organized immediately after that 😯
In a bombshell statement that’s sent shockwaves through the MotoGP world, FIM Chairman Ezpeleta has publicly claimed that “there are far too many irregularities” surrounding the recent Mandalika Grand Prix. His remarks hint at a deeper rot—potential manipulation behind the scenes in what should have been a fair and open competition. According to him, hard evidence has emerged suggesting premeditated arrangements, and a secret investigation is already underway.
Ezpeleta’s comments mark a rare and dramatic escalation. As the figurehead of the international governing body, his words carry immense weight. By openly raising the possibility of foul play, he has thrust MotoGP—and especially the Mandalika event—into crisis mode. The implication is stark: someone may have engineered outcomes, tampered with rules, or manipulated race dynamics.
What prompted him to speak so forcefully now? Behind the scenes, insiders say the accumulated anomalies of the Mandalika race weekend triggered alarms. Observers pointed to suspects in tyre-pressure violations, inexplicable penalties, and suspicious contact incidents. For example, Luca Marini is under investigation after being penalized post-race in the Sprint for reportedly low tyre pressure—something that naturally raises questions. In addition, the first-lap collision between Marco Bezzecchi and Marc Marquez is still under scrutiny: the FIM Stewards have not yet closed the case and plan to revisit it later at another GP. These individual controversies may now form a pattern pointing to systemized interference.
In the wake of Ezpeleta’s declaration, an undisclosed internal inquiry has been launched. According to multiple reports, this is far more than a cursory review: investigators are quietly collecting telemetry, communications, and procedural logs from teams, the circuit, and officials. The FIM, insiders say, is treating this as a “closed investigation” to avoid tipping off those suspected of wrongdoing.
Many in the paddock are recalibrating their expectations. Teams, riders, and sponsors now face the specter of punitive action not just for sporting infractions but for deliberate misconduct. If credible evidence emerges confirming match-fixing or manipulation, the consequences could be seismic: disqualifications, bans, or even legal ramifications. The trust that underpins MotoGP’s legitimacy would be deeply shaken.
From a sporting perspective, the timing of Ezpeleta’s statement is explosive. Mandalika has long been among the most unpredictable circuits on the calendar, and previous runnings have drawn criticism for track surface issues and irregular weather effects. But the shift from grumbling about conditions to a formal accusation of engineered outcomes is unprecedented.
Some analysts caution that while motor racing has endured scandals before, the burden of proof in such cases is incredibly high. Technical data, race director logs, steward reports, and radio transcripts must all align. Any gap could allow those implicated to deny or discredit the findings. Observers therefore see this as a make-or-break moment—either MotoGP proves it can police itself, or it risks losing its integrity.
Fans and media are watching closely. Rumors, social media speculation, and anonymous leaks have already begun to swirl. Whether Ezpeleta’s investigation uncovers a smoking gun or retreats under pressure, the narrative of the 2025 Mandalika race weekend has already been rewritten.
At stake is nothing less than the credibility of the championship. For MotoGP to maintain global stature, it must show that results are driven by speed, strategy, and skill—not hidden machinations behind the scenes. As the anonymous inquiry proceeds, the paddock holds its breath. If the worst is confirmed, the aftershock will be felt far beyond Lombok—for every rider, team, and fan who believed in a fair fight.